Human-audited codes
Gold-standard validation set
MEDICAL HEALTH / AI-ASSISTED CODING
ACE / AUTONOMOUS CODING ENGINEReduce the coding burden with EHR-ready AI that proposes codes, surfaces supporting evidence, and directs uncertain cases to human review.
THE CODING CHALLENGE
ACE analyzes clinical encounters and proposes codes alongside source evidence, confidence scores, and an audit trail. Designed to support efficient, consistent medical coding, it helps healthcare organizations reduce administrative backlogs while maintaining a clear record of how coding decisions were reached.
The solution combines responsible AI, human oversight, and analytics to support transparent, accountable coding workflows across healthcare settings.
ACE BY THE NUMBERS
Gold-standard validation set
Reference knowledge base
Reported demonstration processing time
Reported model confidence, not an accuracy measure
Figures describe the reported validation resources and demonstration results. Encounter time and model confidence do not establish production accuracy or guaranteed performance.
ENCOUNTER EXAMPLE
In the reported demonstration, ACE proposed twelve codes in under thirty seconds: nine ICD-10 diagnoses and three CPT procedures, covering findings from a skull fracture to complex wound repair.
Each code was connected to the supporting words in the encounter note. Conflicts or low-confidence results trigger review by a certified coder.
9 diagnoses · 3 procedures
Source evidence accompanies each proposed code.
KEY STRENGTHS
Ground proposals in coding guidance and evaluate them against human-audited records.
Show the supporting encounter text and reasoning context for review.
Support increasing encounter volumes through a tiered deployment model.
Combine isolated infrastructure, encryption, and defined access boundaries.
HOW ACE COMPARES
Three common challenges. Three ways ACE supports a clearer decision.
Capacity depends on specialist availability.
Score proposals; flag uncertainty for human review.
Rigid logic can miss clinical context.
Connect each proposed code to source evidence.
Missing evidence makes review difficult.
Keep the context behind coding decisions.
THE EVIDENCE PATH
Start with the source record.
Suggest codes with evidence.
Identify conflicts or uncertainty.
Keep evidence and decisions together.
Low-confidence or conflicting proposals route to a certified coder for review.
Conceptual workflow · Supports coding review; model confidence is not a measure of accuracy.
THE ACE INNOVATION
Score outputs and route low-confidence results or conflicting codes to certified human coders.
Evaluate coding outputs against a gold-standard set of more than 6,400 human-audited codes.
Trace each proposed code to the exact passage in the clinical encounter that supports it.
Keep administrative access separate from the clinical data pathway.
Deploy within an isolated virtual private cloud, with encryption at rest and in transit.
Ingest and export standard encounter formats to support integration with clinical workflows.
BUSINESS MODEL
ACE’s fully managed SaaS model combines a one-time deployment license with an annual subscription based on encounter volume. Deployment covers assessment, configuration, integration, tuning, and Authority to Operate (ATO) support.
encounters / year
encounters / year
encounters / year
encounters / year
NegotiatedCommercial and government use
Designed for both commercial health organizations and government missions.
Cloud deployment
Infrastructure as code supports cloud portability, including GovCloud. The current implementation runs on Amazon Bedrock with a pluggable architecture.
WHERE ACE FITS
PILOT PARTNERSHIPS