Grant lifecycle
Bring award information, milestones, and review tasks into a consistent workflow that reflects the program’s funding rules.
PRODUCTS / GRANTS & DEVELOPMENT
GMP / Grants Management PlatformFrom funding decisions to program visibility.
Connect foreign assistance, development funding, and recipient management across the grant lifecycle. GMP helps program teams maintain context from award planning through monitoring and closeout.
Visibility across the grant lifecycle
- 01Program design
- 02Awards & recipients
- 03Program monitoring
WHAT IT SUPPORTS
Grants Management Platform
Recipient management
Organize recipient records and supporting information so teams can coordinate due diligence, communication, and follow-up.
Program monitoring
Connect reporting requirements, delivery milestones, and evidence to help teams identify gaps and track program progress.
FROM INFORMATION TO ACTION
A workflow built
around the mission.
Start with the operating context. Connect the right information. Keep responsibility clear at every step.
Structure the program
Establish the relevant sources, roles, and rules for the work.
Coordinate awards and recipients
Bring useful context into a focused, reviewable task.
Monitor delivery and closeout
Record decisions and route the next step to the right team.
BUILT FOR RESPONSIBLE ADOPTION
Technology with
clear accountability.
Funding eligibility, award decisions, and financial approvals remain subject to the program’s governance. Reporting and review workflows are adapted to donor and local requirements.
Explore the supporting capability
IN THE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT
Maintain the thread from award to delivery.
Grant programs bring funding conditions, recipient obligations, milestones, and evidence together over long periods. GMP’s intended workflow keeps those relationships visible so program teams can follow delivery and resolve reporting gaps.
Who it supports
- Grant managers
- Recipient coordination teams
- Program monitoring teams
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE WORKFLOW
Keep the context connected.
- 01
Program setup
Funding conditions and reporting rules
- 02
Award & recipient
Approved award context and recipients
- 03
Delivery monitoring
Milestones, reports, and evidence
- 04
Review & closeout
Open obligations and final records
THE INTENDED OUTPUT
A connected program record linking commitments, recipients, reporting, and delivery evidence.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
Explore the work
behind the solution.
Illustrative use cases show how this approach can be applied. The deployment scope is defined around your systems, users, and operating requirements.
Prepare a new funding program
Translate program objectives into award information, required evidence, reporting dates, and review responsibilities. A consistent setup helps teams understand what must be tracked before delivery begins.
Follow up on a recipient report
When a submission is incomplete, reviewers need to identify the missing requirement and assign the next action. Connect the report, recipient record, and program obligation to keep follow-up specific.
Prepare for program closeout
Closeout requires a clear view of completed milestones and unresolved obligations. Organize the record so authorized teams can review supporting evidence and determine the appropriate next step.
GMP / OPERATIONAL SCOPE
Connect program delivery with financial accountability.
GMP brings grant administration, recipient coordination, and program evidence into a connected management approach. Budget and financial-reporting context help teams understand an award alongside its delivery obligations.
Program & award structure
Connect the purpose of a funding program with award conditions, reporting requirements, and responsible reviewers. Preserve the relationship between the program, individual awards, and recipient commitments.
Recipient management
Organize recipient information and the records needed for the program’s review process. Assign ownership for missing information and follow-up, with access appropriate to each team’s responsibilities.
Award budget context
Bring approved budget categories and funding conditions into the discussion of program delivery. Define how budget revisions are requested, reviewed, and linked to the award record during implementation.
Financial reporting & reconciliation
Associate recipient financial submissions with reporting periods and supporting evidence. Specify how reported spending is compared with approved award context and how discrepancies are referred to finance reviewers.
Milestones & performance evidence
Connect narrative reports and delivery evidence to the milestones they support. A financial submission and a program milestone provide different information; reviewers need the relationship between them to remain clear.
Amendments & closeout
Preserve the context of changes to an award and the responsibilities for approving them. At closeout, bring outstanding reports, open questions, and completion evidence together for authorized review.
INFORMATION & RESPONSIBILITY
A complete record.
A clear next owner.
Information to connect
- Program rules and award conditions
- Approved budget and reporting periods
- Recipient records and delivery milestones
Grant record to preserve
- Financial and narrative submissions
- Supporting evidence and review questions
- Approved changes and unresolved obligations
Operational handoffs
- Grant and recipient managers
- Finance and program reviewers
- Award approval and closeout authorities
PLANNING YOUR DEPLOYMENT
Questions to resolve
before implementation.
These considerations build on the solution’s intended scope. Specific integrations, configurations, and delivery commitments are confirmed for each engagement.
Does GMP replace the organization’s accounting system?
No replacement of a general ledger, banking platform, or payment system is implied. The solution scope connects grant management with relevant financial context; accounting integrations and the system of record must be agreed during implementation.
How are funding decisions controlled?
Eligibility assessments, award approvals, amendments, and financial authorizations follow the program’s governance. Define the responsible roles and required evidence before configuring those workflows.
How does GMP support multi-national programs?
Discovery should account for donor conditions, recipient relationships, local reporting needs, and any currency or language requirements. Specific processing capabilities must be confirmed rather than assumed.
EVALUATING OPERATIONAL PROGRESS
Agree what success should mean.
Select measures against a documented baseline and the workflow in scope. The examples below are evaluation criteria, not claimed performance results.
Reporting timeliness
Track submissions against the agreed reporting calendar.
Open review items
Monitor unresolved recipient and financial questions.
Closeout readiness
Assess completeness of the evidence required for final review.
IMPLEMENTATION STARTING POINT
What to bring to
the first conversation.
- Donor conditions and program reporting requirements
- Recipient data ownership and due-diligence process
- Award approvals, review roles, and closeout criteria
YOUR NEXT MISSION